Under this policy, version 3. The license conditions and restrictions, however, continue to apply to all uses triggering copyright. Other ports and the 3.
Thus, regardless of the CC 3. Neither the international nor the ported licenses that address database rights export the sui generis rights to jurisdictions where such rights are not recognized the ported licenses accomplish this as well through inclusion of a territoriality limitation.
This avoids the imposition of restrictions based on sui generis rights via contract where those rights are not enforceable or recognized. You may compare how different jurisdictions implemented this section of the license.
In version 4. The 1. The international licenses began to address moral rights in version 3. This avoids establishing moral rights through the license where they would not otherwise exist, but recognizes that there are jurisdictions where this limited waiver is not possible.
The attribution requirements in Section 3 of the 4. In the 3. CC did not include a waiver of those rights in the international licenses. The attribution requirement is designed in part to satisfy the right of attribution. In the 4. No CC license version licenses patent and trademark rights along with copyright.
These rights are treated separately and are not covered by the license. However, in all license versions, implied licenses may come into play where these rights would interfere with exercise of the rights granted by the CC license. We believe this to be a clarification rather than a change: attribution reasonable to the means, medium, and context of use should be permissible for works under any CC license.
Additionally, the pre In earlier license versions, compliance reasonable to means and medium of use was not expressly permitted for all elements, as certain notices were excluded; however, in 4. Versions 2. This feature was introduced in part to alleviate burdensome or difficult attribution situations, such as when many people contribute to a collaborative effort and agree to be credited as a collective body. In licenses with this feature, licensors may designate another party for attribution purposes—such as a sponsor institute, publishing entity or journal—in addition to or instead of the author.
You may review some of the concerns raised when CC proposed this change. This is true whether the work is modified or unmodified. All license versions after version 1.
However, legislation in many countries gives authors the right to control the use of their name in association with their works. Therefore, CC licenses require licensees to remove attribution to the creator at his or her request, where it would otherwise be required to include it.
The title is not required for proper attribution in the 4. It is required in all earlier versions. Beginning in version 1. In Version 4. Users are still encouraged to include titles where supplied. For 4. The version 1. In version 2. However, it was retained based on feedback from current and potential adopters that it is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons; a URI associated with the work is required as part of attribution if reasonably practicable to retain, regardless of whether it contains copyright notices or licensing information.
In some jurisdictions, wrongfully implying that an author, publisher, or anyone else endorses a particular use of a work may be unlawful. Though not explicitly mentioned in the 1. The version 3. This obligation applies whether or not the modifications produced adapted material. As with all other attribution and marking requirements, this may be done in a manner reasonable to the means, medium, and context.
For example, "This section is an excerpt of the original. Versions 1. Even when not required, licensees are encouraged to indicate the material has been modified, and ideally when reasonable to describe or specify the changes made. These warranties were eliminated in all subsequent license versions. Of course, licensors may continue to offer warranties and specialized disclaimers separately from the license.
Some ports of 3. CC licensors may apply such measures to their own licensed material, but the 4. To reinforce this, the version 4.
It is always possible for a licensor to upload his or her own work to a platform that applies technological protection measures, even though the licensor chooses to use a CC license.
The permission for a third-party platform to apply ETMs is separate from the CC license, and the CC license cannot restrict that additional permission because CC licenses are nonexclusive. In many jurisdictions, that third party may be able to enforce ETMs through civil or criminal anti-circumvention laws even though the licensor has waived or agreed not to assert any such right under the CC license.
Licensees should make themselves aware of any legal limits on their ability to circumvent ETMs in advance of doing so. In versions 1. In all license versions, a breach of the license terms results in automatic termination. Under versions 1. This is similar to provisions in a handful of other public licenses. Under 4.
A licensor may collect royalties for commercial uses for works under the NonCommercial licenses. Every license version from the 2.
They provide, for instance, that for works offered under a NonCommercial license, the licensor retains the right to collect royalties for commercial uses of the work. The structure of the provisions in the 2. The 2. As those licenses were ported to different jurisdictions, those provisions were adjusted to conform to the local collecting society situation.
This strategy still allows jurisdictions to adopt an approach that best aligns with local law and society structure in the 3. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. I finally found the super key to success. How to create a floating sidebar on WordPress website. How to create perfect blog Planner for success.
How to remove date from old posts or pages. The 7 Best free popup plugins for WordPress. How to increase Domain authority. Big WordPress ping list for indexing your post faster. Skip to content Blogging tips.
Review of: Type of creative commons - All you should know. Reviewed by: Team Zdidit. On August 24, All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use. This is the license used by Wikipedia, and is recommended for materials that would benefit from incorporating content from Wikipedia and similarly licensed projects. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to you.
0コメント